Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?

deviantART

 

Is taxidermy ART??? 

36%
35 deviants said NO!!!
22%
21 deviants said Yes
21%
20 deviants said I dont' know
17%
16 deviants said Maybe...
4%
4 deviants said *comments*

Devious Comments

:iconkumi-wolf:
absolutely TAXIDERMY IS NOT ART!!! I'm disgusted
:iconmakangeni:
I completely agree!! Taxidermy is an horrible, disgusting, vile thing... I don't know how people can do this...
:iconnap-the-firestarter:
I have to say it depends upon how you go about it. If you use rare and endangered animals then I'm against it, but sometimes it can look good. What I am against is dropping half a shark in a tank of formaldehyde and selling it for millions.

--
---
Fire Up The Disruptors!

Some people are stupid. Others are just batshit crazy

Avatar Courtesy of Aki--Tenraku
:iconmakangeni:
I can't tolerate taxidermy that kill animals only to use them as an object, as a toy, as an ornament... they are live creatures, damn!!
:iconwildstray:
No, e tantopiù se ti riferisci ai vari plush di animali veri che vanno tanto ultimamente su DA: per me non è arte ma un vile commercio di pellicce :( In quel caso vengono appositamente ordinate pelli (e quindi uccisi animali) per farne dei giocattoli per bimbiminkia... :x Mi ero già espresso nelle varie discussioni qui e sul forum, e (ovviamente) rimango della stessa idea! Anche "solo" vedere animali impagliati in musei ecc mi fa molta impressione e tristezza... preferisco vederli vivi oppure filmati, fotografati... e disegnati ;)
:iconmakangeni:
quoto tutto quello che hai scritto -__- questa cosa mi fa sentire davvero male... ho voluto aprire questo sondaggio per vedere come la pensavano i miei watchers e con tristezza vedo che non tutti dicono "no"... vorrei sapere chi sono quelli che hanno votato "yes" per eliminarli dalla lista degli amici ma purtroppo non hanno commentato...
:iconmarine-snow:
If it is used to honour the animal, then yes. Same for humans. There is a man that took the body of his wife and his horse and took away their skin, covered the muscle in wax, and mounted them together as a statue--out of love.

To kill the animal for the sole purpose of mounting is disrespectful and a disgrace. I can't stand that. But if part of the animal is used, such as the meat, and you come from a background that respects nature, and you want to remember the creature, then it's okay I think. Same thing as taking the hide to use as a blanket imo.
:iconmakangeni:
yes, it's right. however without exagerate...
I open that poll because I know someone that on deviantART sell dead animals (usually she kills them for this) as stupid toys!! and people is happy! people tells that it's ART!!! And I can't tolerate it...
art is not death...
:iconmarine-snow:
I know a couple of artists that do taxidermy, but all of the animals they receive are already dead--most of them are all accidents. Caught in fences, hit and run, shot as a pest, etc. When an animal is killed this way I think it's okay to remember them by erecting their pelts on a false body; it gives them a second life.

It's horrible to go out and kill them yourself and then set it up and sell it... that's just horrible. I would hope karma got this person and did something awful to them. :/
:iconmakangeni:
I agree X( I really can't understand this monstrous person...

Site Map