I have to say it depends upon how you go about it. If you use rare and endangered animals then I'm against it, but sometimes it can look good. What I am against is dropping half a shark in a tank of formaldehyde and selling it for millions.
--
--- Fire Up The Disruptors!
Some people are stupid. Others are just batshit crazy
No, e tantopiù se ti riferisci ai vari plush di animali veri che vanno tanto ultimamente su DA: per me non è arte ma un vile commercio di pellicce In quel caso vengono appositamente ordinate pelli (e quindi uccisi animali) per farne dei giocattoli per bimbiminkia... Mi ero già espresso nelle varie discussioni qui e sul forum, e (ovviamente) rimango della stessa idea! Anche "solo" vedere animali impagliati in musei ecc mi fa molta impressione e tristezza... preferisco vederli vivi oppure filmati, fotografati... e disegnati
quoto tutto quello che hai scritto -__- questa cosa mi fa sentire davvero male... ho voluto aprire questo sondaggio per vedere come la pensavano i miei watchers e con tristezza vedo che non tutti dicono "no"... vorrei sapere chi sono quelli che hanno votato "yes" per eliminarli dalla lista degli amici ma purtroppo non hanno commentato...
If it is used to honour the animal, then yes. Same for humans. There is a man that took the body of his wife and his horse and took away their skin, covered the muscle in wax, and mounted them together as a statue--out of love.
To kill the animal for the sole purpose of mounting is disrespectful and a disgrace. I can't stand that. But if part of the animal is used, such as the meat, and you come from a background that respects nature, and you want to remember the creature, then it's okay I think. Same thing as taking the hide to use as a blanket imo.
yes, it's right. however without exagerate... I open that poll because I know someone that on deviantART sell dead animals (usually she kills them for this) as stupid toys!! and people is happy! people tells that it's ART!!! And I can't tolerate it... art is not death...
I know a couple of artists that do taxidermy, but all of the animals they receive are already dead--most of them are all accidents. Caught in fences, hit and run, shot as a pest, etc. When an animal is killed this way I think it's okay to remember them by erecting their pelts on a false body; it gives them a second life.
It's horrible to go out and kill them yourself and then set it up and sell it... that's just horrible. I would hope karma got this person and did something awful to them. :/
Devious Comments
--
---
Fire Up The Disruptors!
Some people are stupid. Others are just batshit crazy
Avatar Courtesy of Aki--Tenraku
To kill the animal for the sole purpose of mounting is disrespectful and a disgrace. I can't stand that. But if part of the animal is used, such as the meat, and you come from a background that respects nature, and you want to remember the creature, then it's okay I think. Same thing as taking the hide to use as a blanket imo.
I open that poll because I know someone that on deviantART sell dead animals (usually she kills them for this) as stupid toys!! and people is happy! people tells that it's ART!!! And I can't tolerate it...
art is not death...
It's horrible to go out and kill them yourself and then set it up and sell it... that's just horrible. I would hope karma got this person and did something awful to them. :/
Previous Page1234Next Page